UK Government difference with Europe over carbon permit revenue

While the EU has insisted hat revenue earned by member stats from the sale of carbon permits should be used to combat climate change, Defra specifically ruled out such a commitment, either in phase three of the ETS or in phase two, which began this year.

Defra’s document was published on the same day that the CBI added its voice to the growing campaign for earmarking of carbon permit revenues, known as hypothecation. In an open letter to the Prime Minster, the CBI, is Climate Change Task Force and the conservation group WWF-UK said phase two of the ETS would raise at least £ 1.6bn in additional revenues for the Government and called for a pledge that the money would b spent on “supporting emerging climate change technologies”.

The European Commission has begun consulting on a directive that would make it illegal for member states not to earmark carbon auction revenues for green measures once phase three of the ETS begins. This move reflects growing irritation among the EU’s officials in Brussels that governments across the bloc have not given a commitment to spend the money raised by the scheme in this way.
Environmental campaigners have argued that without hypothecation money raised form green taxes could end up being spent on road building projects or other initiatives that could actually exacerbate climate change.

The dispute is coming to a head now because business leaders and EU member states expect phase two of the ETS to produce much more sizeable revenues than phase one, which was undermined by the over-issuance of carbon emission permits by many governments.

carbon credit India
carbon credit conference 2009